Янгиликлар
The other side of the issue!
It would be wrong to say that the increase in bribery in society is due to the fact that there are many people who offer it. It has nothing to do with a selfish person, he is still looking for a way to bribe. But what drives people to work with religion is to do it. I think if you are offered a lot of money, even if you refuse once or twice, you will think about the third time (I can't say all). You may agree to this only once to finish your dilapidated building, or to have a better wedding for your child, or to envy your neighbor's new car, or to decorate your wife's diary that she needs it, and so on. That's the decent thing to do, and it should end there. It's a great way to get word out that you're interested in learning, and it's a great way to start learning.
Now, what is it that makes people become "those bribe-takers"? Perhaps if we reduce bribery, those who take bribes will also decrease! First, by bribery, people try to get things done quickly and easily. Because in our system there is too much paperwork, too much running. That's probably why people prefer to finish their work smoothly, without being too busy, and to act like "a fool goes on, the mind pays a bribe." For example, 3 or 4 years ago, when applying to higher education institutions, an applicant spent a lot of time traveling from a remote village to Tashkent, carrying a lot of documents, but here is a letter from one of the "Mr." documents sitting in the admissions committee. if he sends it back saying it's written a little differently! Do you think that the applicant will pay the bribe and pass the documents, or will he go to the district or province to correct the document because he is against bribery (it was a strange question)? Fortunately, the system is up and running online, and many of our parents and applicants save time, money, and nerves at the same time.
I think that in other systems today, paperwork will be reduced and the transition to online will put an end to corruption, albeit to a lesser extent.
Second, even minor felony or administrative offenses are punishable by a "horse's-head" fine, so people are more likely to opt for a smaller amount of money. If the giver is interested in paying much less than the fine, he will make a big profit for himself by losing "little" to the state. It is true that there must be fines, which are necessary for the maintenance of order and for the benefit of the state treasury, but its excessiveness forces the population to look for tricks. With that in mind, perhaps if fines for non-serious crimes or administrative offenses are reduced, the money that goes into someone’s pocket can also go to the state treasury and bring in more revenue than it does now. Thank God, in recent years, our people have become more aware that the money they pay in fines will be used for something that will benefit the population, if it goes to the state treasury, rather than going into someone's pocket.
Jarqurghon District Department of Justice
senior adviser S.Allanazarov